Author: The Sonoran Internationalists

  • A Sketch of Communist Positions

    The following is a short work detailing Communism in a way that we highly agree with. The author(s) can be reached at InternationalistClub@proton.me

  • On Venezuela – Uncritical Support to the Proletariat

    On Venezuela – Uncritical Support to the Proletariat

    Audio:

    En Español

    On January 3rd, 2026, the United States launched a military attack on the Venezuelan capital which resulted in the capture and removal of then President Maduro and his wife.

    Regardless of whatever the justification given by the imperialist bourgeois state for doing so, it is very clear that this was little more than jockeying for control of evermore depleted natural resources and a portion of the Earth’s surplus value by ensuring the political domination of the Venezuelan working class. The United States has just engaged in an act of imperialist aggression to attempt to maintain  its current position as the strongest capitalist power. Meanwhile Russia and China also engage in imperialist aggression, but for the purposes of furthering their own ambitions as up and coming powers. These imperialist actions must be recognized as nothing more than a manifestation of global capitalist competition.

    Whenever the ruling class of a nation sees it necessary to engage in warfare to enlarge its own market share they send proletarians off to the battlefield, off to kill some other proletarians who follow the bidding of their own national ruling class. Whatever the outcomes of the battles or wars, the only ones who stand to gain in these conflicts are the ruling class, while the costs are always borne by the working class across all sides. Whether a bullet fired is from a gun on the defensive side or the offensive, the result is a dead worker who never should have been forced to die for the profit of others.

    The signs are quite clear that Capitalism, which has already outlived its historical condition, grows closer and closer to a third imperialist world war. Palestine and Ukraine are two other examples of Imperialist powers vying for resources and strategic edge. Such military intervention will only continue to become more and more frequent and intense as the capitalist system draws closer to crisis.

    It must be understood that such competition is unavoidable under Capitalism. It can not be avoided by getting a good member of the bourgeoisie to rule over us, nor even (though this would of course never happen) a truly revolutionary member of the proletarian class party into the bourgeois government. War will likewise not be avoided by allowing a different imperialist bloc to hold sway over Venezuela, nor any other region of the world.

    Our only path towards a future without futile and highly destructive wars is the coming together of the workers of the world, united by our common interests. The abolition of nations, wars, wage slavery, and all the other manners of oppression present in our current system is an imperative that must guide us all. To achieve this there must be a refusal to compromise on our revolutionary ends. Support for a capitalist power for any reason at all can only be understood as a counterrevolutionary betrayal.

    As such, our opposition is not to Capitalist aggression, but rather to the Capitalist system itself. Our support does not go critically to the Venezuelan nation or government, but uncritically to the proletariat of all nations. We stand for a united humanity, and we recognize that this cannot be achieved through the support of any nation or side in current imperialist conflicts. What we see today are symptoms of our own barbarism, of our continued existence within a system that has long outlived its usefulness and needs to be put to an end.

    No war but the class war!

    No defense of the homeland! No alliances with the bourgeoisie! 

    International unity of the working class!

    After all,

    Socialism or Barbarism, Communism or Extinction – There is no third way!

  • What We Do

    What We Do

    Intro

    In both our writing and our outreach to individual workers and organizations, the question we are most often asked is: “What do you do?” Usually this question carries an implied belief that our organization exists solely to criticize other groups. While this impression is understandable, it is not accurate. Much of our early work has focused on criticism of various non-Communist organizations and ideas, but this has only been a necessary first step to distinguish our methodology and ultimate goals from those groups. This is not our organization’s only focus.

    We acknowledge that up to now we have mostly mentioned our purpose and aspirations in bits and pieces across other texts. We write this document to clarify what we do as an organization, what we aim to do, and what actions we believe readers should take if they share our commitment to building a revolutionary force under capitalism.

    What we Do

    Four months ago, our founding members created this organization to fill a niche that did not exist in Southern Arizona. That being, a theoretically grounded revolutionary organization. Our principal task is to further the intellectual understanding and development of the class struggle within the class, and to organize towards the realization of Communism as a class. 

    To this end, our primary method has been the writing of a monthly publication in which we analyze the trends in our local area and connect them to the global class conflict through a materialist lens. Such writing is important not just because of the finished articles we have released, but for the development of our own theoretical understanding of the capitalist world through the collaborative writing process itself. 

    Connected to this is our hosting of group readings and discussions of Communist theory and the history of the class struggle. While reading a book will not overthrow Capitalism, the understanding and unity we have developed through such activities is the tantamount first step towards the realization of the movements of Capital towards its own destruction.

    Further, we have (albeit to a small capacity) intervened in local demonstrations to be the militant presence at these events. Contrary to the false binary of showing critical support to non-communist movements or being completely absent, we believe that an active presence outside and counter to such movements is a key task of militants.

    To put it succinctly, our primary purpose is to provide a resolute analysis of the past, present, and future of the class struggle. We succeed when we help someone deepen their existing class consciousness, of their position within the global class struggle, and of the long history of proletarian victories and defeats.

    What we Aim to Do

    In the few months of our existence our membership has grown alongside our understanding of numerous topics, providing us with both more organizational capacity and greater clarity, enabling us to expand our work.

    Alongside our reading groups, writing sessions, and discussions with comrades from around the world, we will soon start hosting regular in person meetings, which we will announce on our website and Instagram.

    Lastly, we aim to intervene at more events where discontented workers are likely to be present, particularly those seeking an alternative to the capitalist system. This will help us build connections, better clarify our positions, and encourage further learning and militancy.

    We realize that our viewpoint is not palatable to most workers at this time, because (given historical patterns) the working class can only be radicalized in great numbers by the inevitable intensification of capitalist crisis. For this reason, we do not “meet the class where they are at.” Rather, we prepare for the moment when more and more of the class can meet us, and hopefully even surpass us.

    At a time when the contradictions of the capitalist system are increasingly undeniable, and so interest in an alternative to the current social model is growing, clarifying what communism is and is not must be understood as active work. When “Communism” is constantly misidentified as Mamdani’s idea of municipal grocery stores, Chinese state capitalism, or as any of the other countless distortions put forward by capital, fighting to develop and defend theoretical clarity is not merely an academic exercise, it is a necessary and material form of intervention.

    Our goal is to help ensure that the future revolutionary moment becomes a genuine transformation of society from capitalism to Communism, rather than another reorganization of capital, as has happened in the past. This will be achieved by helping to develop a coherent Communist program and by advocating for its implementation by the larger working class. We see ourselves as simply the local contingent of the global revolutionary movement of the working class.

    It is worth restating that while the theoretical defense of Communism is our primary purpose, it is not our only purpose.  While the crisis that radicalizes workers is made by capitalism, the movement that turns this crisis into a revolution is not an automatic process that will complete itself without any work. 

    For now, since we are only just starting in person events, we cannot provide a full picture of everything our work will entail yet. However, we can say this: it will no doubt involve skill sharing, presentations, continued engagement with local struggles, further exploration of the class history of our region, and other group activities that align with the purpose of our organization. By steadily cultivating and renewing our revolutionary consciousness, we ensure that our actions remain effective, advance our development, and strengthen the class movement in our area.

    What Should You DO?

    We consider all people and organizations who share our key positions to be in the “proletarian camp”, that is, part of the Communist movement, of which we are only a small part. This movement consists of the minority of workers who recognize themselves as part of the larger working class and genuinely advocate for it to achieve its ultimate goal: the creation of a Communist society through an international proletarian revolution. The establishment of such a society represents the liberation of all life on Earth from our irrational and uncaring system. 

    Communist revolutionaries have the task of helping point the larger class in the direction towards Communism. Anyone who wants to see human history advance towards a free, Communist world, should become organized with those who share that vision of our collective future. We formed this organization out of that conviction, and we are now confident that we provide a space for this necessary work.

    To those who share our commitment to rebuilding and advancing the international organization of the working class, we invite you to reach out to us (or any other Communist organizations listed in our External Links page) with any questions, comments, ideas, criticisms, or requests to get involved.

    Socialism or Barbarism, Communism or Extinction, there is no third way!

  • National Liberation Will Not Save Palestinian Lives

    National Liberation Will Not Save Palestinian Lives

    Also in Español

    We Are Firmly Against This Genocide

    Over the last 2 years, Israel has killed anywhere from 65,000 to 680,000 Palestinians.1 In a campaign of indiscriminate bombing, land invasion of the entire Gaza Strip, and the forced relocation of nearly the entire civilian population. It is obvious that the actions of the Israeli state constitute mass ethnic cleansing to make way for the benefit of global capital’s accumulation. Important to note is also that such policies have not been taken only in the past two years, but are merely an escalation of the ethnic cleansing that Israel has been engaged in since the Nakba in 1948. Anyone who refuses to acknowledge this reality cannot be taken seriously on the subject. 

    In response to this extermination presented for the world to see, movements dedicated to opposing material aid to Israel have appeared across the planet. We write this article primarily for the members of these movements, because we sympathize with them greatly. Yet it was in our time taking part in and observing the actions of these movements that we have come to believe that a full theoretical understanding of the causes of this genocide is rarely held, and the conclusions that are drawn as a result of such lack of a materialist worldview will lead to nothing but further inability to effectively confront the system of capitalism, the ultimate cause of this genocide. 

    It is not enough to discuss events past or present and to act without full theoretical clarity. We must think critically about the full implications of them, what caused them, as well as what course of action we must take to actually end such atrocities. Capitalism, which the entire world finds itself struggling under, exists precisely because it captures revolutionary energy that might supersede it (alongside its massacres) into organizational dead ends that seek only to target its worst manifestations. We must attack its roots and not its branches. What this means is that in order to actually end such massacres, we must first educate ourselves to know how to overthrow capitalism, and further, to know what it actually means to overthrow capitalism.

    Idealist Abstractions of The Non-Communist Left

    Certainly, it may be quite a controversial statement to say that capitalism is the cause of the ongoing Palestinian genocide. Rarely is it denied by those opposed to the genocide that capitalism has provided the framework for such a genocide to happen, even that capitalism has incentivized it to happen. Yet despite this, there is still an apprehension by many organizations and individuals to admit that the ongoing genocide was caused and continues to happen inseparably because of capitalism.

    This apprehension has many causes, most obviously among them the lack of a materialist understanding of how capitalism directly causes and then informs other oppressive systems and beliefs such as racism, nationalism, imperialism and sexism. Such a flawed idealist conception of the world can be seen quite clearly in the broadly accepted notion of “Intersectionality” within the non-communist left. Taken definitionally, intersectionality is:

    “The interconnected nature of social categorizations such as race, class, and gender, regarded as creating overlapping and interdependent systems of discrimination or disadvantage; a theoretical approach based on such a premise.”

    -Oxford Dictionary

    At first glance, this seems to be a correct understanding of how the world works. Certainly we do not deny that Capitalism is interconnected with systems such as Racism, Sexism, and Imperialism. Where we do disagree is in the notion that class is (if even present) portrayed as on equal footing to and in some respects independent of other forms of oppression. Such is a notion that has been demonstrably proven false historically. Modern racism as a social institution did not exist prior to mercantilist (early capitalist) chattel slavery, which necessitated its creation to justify its means of exploitation. Sexism has existed since ancient times, yet its manifestation has always been dependent on the class relations that enforced and created it. Imperialism became a global institution only as capital, driven by its own growth, necessitated new markets for continued growth and exploitation.

    A lack of such understanding, and more importantly its consequences, can be seen in the propaganda and subsequent actions of the various non-communist left organizations that constantly pin the genocide on individuals, ideas, or nations; rather than on the all encompassing global system of capitalism. And which subsequently argue (purposefully or unwittingly) that we must fight these individuals, ideas, or nations rather than their source, capitalism. Take for example the Party for Socialism and Liberation’s article “Trump a full partner in Israel’s onslaught against Iran, risks wider war”2 which states:

    “Donald Trump is the co-architect of the Israeli war against Iran and shares full responsibility with Benjamin Netanyahu for the extraordinary danger facing the whole world.”

    -The Party for Socialism and Liberation

    Notably, this article contained zero mentions of capital, capitalism, capitalists, profit, socialism, labor, the proletariat, or workers. Something which is certainly strange for a supposedly socialist organization. Surprising even to us was their decision not to even mention as much as the fact that such imperialist policies were similarly taken by the government prior to Trump. As a result, they place the blame squarely on the shoulders of individual heads of state and feuds between particular nations, rather than on the ruling class of all nations, the international bourgeoisie. Essentially repeating the nationalistic propaganda of the ruling class and spinning it as communist rhetoric for them.

    Claim as they may that such blatant abandonment of the class struggle was partaken as part of a strategy of “meeting the working class where they’re at,” the result of such a strategy is the same; venting of actual class struggle into reformism. They betray the fact that they do not wish to overturn the existing bourgeois world system, but instead see themselves as the vanguard of international bourgeois law by their statement in the same article:

    “Make no mistake, the Israeli war against Iran is a clear violation of the UN Charter, and thus a violation of international law.”

    -The Party for Socialism and Liberation

    Refusing to spread the actual aims of communism is non-communist, but to reify the institutions of bourgeois control over the world is undeniably anti-communist. Such doctrine comes not from thin air, but as a direct result of an idealistic understanding of what causes atrocities such as the Palestinian genocide.

    Why Does Capitalism Cause Such Atrocities?

    Put most simply, Capitalism causes such atrocities due to its tendency to make redundant swathes of the working class through its necessary development of capital accumulation. Such is not a novel or new tendency that must be uniquely resisted separate to capitalism (nor can it be), but an intrinsic part of the system that has existed for as long as capitalism itself.

    As a brief explanation of why this occurs, the bourgeoisie (who gain their wealth only by the expropriation of surplus value produced by the proletariat), due to their competition amongst one another are forced to produce commodities for as little value as possible. Value (which under capitalism is determined solely by socially necessary labor time) must in this way be optimized either by using capital (machinery) to reduce the labor time spent on the production of any given commodity, or by increasingly exploiting the working class (paying them less for their labor, etc). What this means is that due to their own competition, the bourgeois must lay off workers whose jobs are made redundant, leaving vast sections of the proletariat impoverished. A further explanation of the actual economics behind this has been linked at the bottom of the work.

    What is important for the topic at hand here is that in response to this mass impoverishment, the proletariat, in leaps and bounds, realizes its collective interest against the system, and will take whatever course of action they feel will best preserve their own survival. This radicalism within the working class, brought about by the material conditions of capitalism represents the source of capital’s destruction; but is also something which the bourgeoisie, in an effort to preserve their own survival as a class, has learned to warp through obfuscation and lies into non-communist forms through the division of the working class via arbitrary distinctions such as nationality, race, religion, sexuality, and gender.

    In the United States, this process can be seen most clearly through the historical shifts in immigration policy taken at different stages in capitalism’s development, and the subsequent spread of racist attitudes and oppression that followed. It is possible to track like clockwork the cyclical nature by which the bourgeois state, according to the needs of the class it represents, either allows or expels migrants from abroad. During both the first and second world wars, the state, in a situation in which capital necessitated large amounts of growth, relaxed immigration policy to allow large numbers of migrant workers to enter the country. Programs that were then reversed and replaced with state oppression of migrants in the following periods of stagnation.

    Such oppressive government policy was undertaken not because the government was evil, but because the proletariat, faced with impoverishment as a consequence of their increasing redundancy, could only be prevented from overthrowing capitalism by sacrificing a section of themselves to prolong their usefulness to the rest of the economy.

    This is not a uniquely American phenomenon, of course, as similar patterns are visible globally. The Holocaust3, the Armenian Genocide4, and of course the Palestinian genocide are but a few examples of how economic realities under capitalism lead to genocide. The Nakba quite clearly began not due to an intrinsic Jewish hatred towards the Palestinian population or vice versa, but because Palestinians needed to be forced out to allow for the appropriation of property for the vast number of Israeli settlers that capital felt best suited their interests to have inhabit the region. Palestinians have since been kept in the region by capital as a disenfranchised reserve army of labor, callable upon when necessitated by capital’s growth, and dismissible when necessitated as a concession from capital to the Israeli proletariat. In the current economic conditions of both Israel and the rest of the global capitalist system, there simply is no room for Palestinians in the capitalist economy. To attempt to resist this specific manifestation of capital without resisting the system of capitalism in its entirety is to try to change the laws of nature.

    The role of communist militants must always be to connect the struggles of any particular section of the working class at any one time to the historical oppression of the whole working class. Our task is to continually point to the fact that similar genocides have occurred in the past and that it is possible to not only discern why they occurred (as we have just done) but also to use the lessons learned in blood of how they were opposed in the past, in order to teach those who want to truly oppose genocide what will and will not achieve this goal. In furthering this theoretical understanding we help inform strategy and action, ensuring that the misconceptions and pitfalls of various kinds that have been fallen into in the past are avoided. This is not a history lecture; it is a critical analysis of the mistakes and successes of our past, it is the continuation of lessons the militant workers of the world have learned themselves through lifetimes of effort. When we criticize these ideas and those who believe them, it is for the benefit of future victims of imperialist slaughter and for all of humanity, who serve to be liberated by our cause.

    Against Full Support of National Liberation

    The most clearly non-Communist and thus ineffectual form that this activism has taken is through the organizations that proclaim full support for the national liberation of Palestine (and as such the concept of nationality) as a worthwhile or necessary end in and of itself. These organizations fall into two broad categories. Firstly, those that solely exist to advocate national liberation. Secondly, those who falsify the doctrine of Socialism, and as such claim that it should support such national liberation. Both of these groups ultimately fail to address the underlying causes of the genocide, and it is these organizations that advocate for nationalism and national liberation as part of a socialist strategy that represent the most dangerous tendency within the left.  Hereafter, we will refer to the organizations that comprise this ideological tendency, which advocates national liberation as a method to advance Communism, with an unsettling yet accurate title for their beliefs, National Socialists. 

    Advocating solely for the national liberation of Palestine as the National Socialists do, is ultimately a disservice to the people who are being genocided along its national lines. This approach only addresses the imperialist component of capital without challenging the greater system that ultimately produces it. Anti-imperialism without anti-capitalism is ultimately fighting a symptom rather than a cause, and this avenue will lead only to further genocides and imperialist wars. Such an approach fundamentally leads to a struggle that (if it succeeds) will only lead to a new state which must then itself engage in the imperialist system of capitalism. Such a fact is not merely theoretical but backed up by the history of national/ethnic liberation movements. 

    Would these National Socialists have supported the struggle of the Hutu people to overthrow the colonial backed Tutsi regime in Rwanda prior to 1990? It is undeniable that prior to their overthrow, the Hutus were oppressed by the Tutsis in a very real and material way. Similar to Israel, the Tutsi regime was also backed by the Imperialist capitalist blocs for the purposes of neocolonialism. The circumstances are of course different in the way that the Tutsi did not themselves come from abroad and force the Hutus off the land, yet if genetic ties to land or historical tradition is the sole reason for a supposedly socialist organization’s stance on which nations should be supported in their right to violently take claim to a piece of land, it is hopefully clear that they are not at all socialist, but reactionary defenders of the doctrine of blood and soil. 

    For decades, various Hutu ethnic liberation groups attempted to overthrow the Tutsi regime and failed quite similarly to the Palestinian national liberation movement. This of course, all changed when the imperialist powers decided it was in their best interest to instead back the Hutus instead of the Tutsis. While the interests of American capital are today very linked to that of the Israeli state, it is already known today that Hamas was funded by Israel and Qatar. It is also a readily available fact that Syria and Iran have participated by proxy in the region’s conflict.

    In 1972, an issue of “Workers Vanguard” (A Trotskyist newspaper with which we do not fully share our views with) wrote “Nor is the nationalism of the oppressed any more noble. Let it not be forgotten that the Palestinian Arabs are victims of the nationalism of the oppressed turned oppressor. In Burundi, had the Hutu’s coup against the ruling minority Tutsi been successful, the tribalism of the oppressed would have translated itself into the genocidal nationalism of the oppressor, All nationalism is reactionary, for successful nationalism equals genocide.”5 Certainly a shockingly clairvoyant prediction given our hindsight of what happened in 1994 when the Hutu indeed did succeed in their coup against the Tutsi. 

    While it may be hard for us to today comprehend a world in which the tables suddenly flip and it is the Palestinians who have the power under capitalism to engage in an ethnic cleansing campaign against the Israelis (who contrary to the racist dogmatism of National Socialist parties like PSL are not are all nepo babies who willingly came to Israel from Brooklyn), all that it would take for the balance of power in the region to suddenly shift would be for the Western powers to decide that support for a Palestinian satellite state is better suited to their goals or for Chinese capitalism to decide that competition against the western powers in the region is necessary for its continued growth and for it to successfully enforce the creation of a Palestinian state within their sphere of influence.

    In such a turn of events, the entire movement of entryism and rallying around the national liberation of Palestine would all at once turn on the National Socialists’ heads and, as all non-communist movements do, be co-opted by capital into something that even more directly serves its interests.

    Though it’s impossible to tell whether or not a Palestinian national liberation movement would succeed at overthrowing Israeli nationalism; the results of either the failure or success of such a movement are, from analysis of history, crystal clear. Rwanda is but one example. We could also look to Cambodia under the Khmer Rouge, Bosnia in 1995, Darfur since 2003, the Rohingya in Myanmar, Tigray in Ethiopia, or currently the Masalit, a non-Arab population in Sudan to see the same process repeating itself across time. 

    There is no method by which national liberation can be in any way a building block of Communist society, and there is no method by which Communists can support it without themselves becoming the pawns of Capitalism.

    What Does it Actually Mean to Support or Not Support National Liberation Movements

    With this in mind, we must also ask what such support given by such organizations within the non-communist left actually means. Within this wider discussion, we see a lot of confusion and false understanding about the nature by which we can actually give support to Palestinians in their resistance to this genocide. Contrary to the lies repeated by the propaganda machine of the ruling class, no American protester is sending weapons to Hamas. No, all that the talk and moralizing of support for national liberation amounts to is using mechanisms of political pressure on our ruling class through protest campaigns with the hope of forcing them to stop the genocide.

    This objective of the Pro-Palestine protest movement, putting pressure on our government to stop sending weapons, will absolutely never be enough. Under capitalism, protest movements do not and cannot force these concessions to happen. Because the power lies fully with the ruling class, they are fully able to choose how long to ignore any given protest movement or any minority political movement asking them for some demand. All that political pressure achieves in the decision making process of the ruling class is to help them calculate exactly what mechanisms are best to achieve their goal (profit extraction through ethnic cleansing and Israeli settlement). If the US is forced to stop sending weapons, it can give those weapons to Germany and in turn Germany will give the IDF the weapons instead. Alternatively, the US military could decide that because this is a conflict, it can simply hide its activity from the public, claiming to stop assisting this genocide while continuing to do so. We fundamentally do not live in a society where working people have full knowledge of exactly what any government is doing, we only know what they themselves tell us. Accordingly, there are endless ways that the ruling class can co-opt, mislead, or fully ignore pressure put on them by the protest movements of the working class who ask them for change, because this process is all taking place in a situation where the ruling class holds all the leverage.

    This lack of effect that declaring support for the various national liberation movements around the world actually has (even in helping the national bourgeois of any given region to establish their own exploitation of one sect of the international proletariat over another imperialist bloc, which is all that national liberation actually represents) must then be contrasted with the immense destructive impact such blatant disregard for internationalism has on the function of any organization that calls itself Communist in the actual struggle between the proletariat and bourgeoisie. Communist organizations cannot themselves defend the rights or lives of workers under capitalism, they cannot lead and win the revolution themselves, and they cannot in any serious way lead capitalism towards better outcomes. The sole vector by which organizations of militant workers (or anyone) can actually do anything to save both our species and our planet from the all encompassing system of global Capitalism is by preparing to turn the crisis of capital into a revolution that will supersede it. Key to this preparation is being the consistent body that develops the memory of the class as to its historic interests and the consistent voice that spreads this knowledge amongst the working class. In both of these domains, support for national liberation by Communist organizations serves only to play into the abstractions of the capitalist system and to divide the international among nationalist lines. For this reason, it can be considered only to be an anti-communist and counter-revolutionary practice, and one which actual Communists must make a concerted point to denounce as such.

    Against Opportunist Critical Support

    In contrast to full support for the national liberation of Palestine, there is a countervalent logic within certain sects of the left who, rather than support the national liberation of Palestine as an end goal in and of itself, advocate it on the grounds of national liberation weakening “The Empire” and being an example of successful working class mobilization that can push further action.  We often even see a hybrid approach where a group may flip back and forth between both perspectives. For example the PSL says in a separate article of theirs:

    “This (support of national liberation) is not only a morally correct position for the U.S. movement but a strategic necessity. The capitalist class that supports and profits from the oppression of Palestinians is the same capitalist class that creates poverty, inequality, and insecurity within the United States. Thus, if those capitalists lose their domination over Palestine, the working class movement here will benefit. So too would the Palestinian liberation struggle benefit if those capitalists lose their domination over the U.S. working class. International solidarity is a necessary tool to build a strong working class movement on many fronts against a common enemy.”

    -The Party for Socialism and Liberation6

    It would be understandable to read this position and agree that it represents true proletarian internationalism, they are correct after all, that we have a duty to fight against our own national bourgeoisie during all wars and with the necessity of international solidarity. The problem arises when we look at what is meant by their exact form of solidarity with “Palestinian liberation” because in effect they mean support for the national liberation of Palestine, not support for the liberation of the Palestinian working class. 

    If we confuse national liberation for a substitute for or a stepping stone to international proletarian revolution, then we continue in a direction away from Communism. Nationalism of all kinds, even underdog nationalism, is an anti-communist goal. Class collaboration is similarly a measure that has only led to disaster and death for those who want to bring about a liberated humanity without borders or a ruling class.

    Because we exist in a world with large imperialist power blocs constantly competing with one another for influence, we have to ensure that our theory and actions are directly opposed to the capitalist system itself, rather than in support of one component of the system or one section of the ruling class against another.

    We know that the leadership of Hamas operates as a militia for the capitalist ruling class of other imperialist blocs, principally Iran, and it uses an ideology of Palestinian nationalism for propaganda to cloak its particular form of oppressive control. This means that if we hold our noses and give critical support, we are opening the door to a very dangerous move, collaboration and sympathy with nationalist movements and capitalist states. If there is any lesson that Communists have learned in the last 100 years of counterrevolution, it is that we cannot work with, or support in any form, any cause that does not support our goal of a united and liberated humanity. It should be clear that the creation of an independent Palestinian state, regardless of other effects, would not assist the international working class in its task of organizing a revolution and the establishment of a new society.

    As the Internationalist Communist Tendency so eloquently puts it:

    “The project of national liberation, the so-called “right of nations to self-determination” is the project of the bourgeoisie that was completed as the imperialist phase of capitalism began. Today [the] ability of a national bourgeoisie to realize its project of national liberation hinges entirely in its capacity to mobilize backing and capital from a major imperialist power. This was clear from the very struggles that created Israel itself”7

    -The Internationalist Communist Tendency

    The dissolution and creation of nation-states is firmly in the framework of competition and struggle between the various capitalist blocs, and therefore not for the workers of the world to treat with any real legitimacy. This is evidenced when the Soviet Union supported the creation of the state of Israel in 1947, both diplomatically by being the first state to officially recognize them and by materially sending arms from Czechoslovakia, then part of the Soviet bloc, to aid them in their establishment. Such support was given by the “great and authentic” Soviet Union, not because they wanted to support the right of national determination for a group who had just come out of a genocide, but because they felt it would deal a decisive blow to the imperialist British and French control of the region and support their own ambitions as a bourgeois world power.

    “As we know, the aspirations of a considerable part of the Jewish people are linked with the problem of Palestine and of its future administration. This fact scarcely requires proof. … During the last war, the Jewish people underwent exceptional sorrow and suffering. …

    The United Nations cannot and must not regard this situation with indifference, since this would be incompatible with the high principles proclaimed in its Charter. …

    The fact that no Western European State has been able to ensure the defence of the elementary rights of the Jewish people and to safeguard it against the violence of the fascist executioners explains the aspirations of the Jews to establish their own State. It would be unjust not to take this into consideration and to deny the right of the Jewish people to realize this aspiration.” 

    -Soviet ambassador Andrei Gromyko 14 May 1947

    What Should We Actually Be Doing?

    If supporting national liberation will not actually save Palestinian lives or bring an end to capitalism, but will more likely than not achieve the exact opposite, then what is it that we can actually do to end the genocide? 

    We express our solidarity with Palestinians, not a Palestinian nation, because nations are merely a form of political division of people. We express our support for the working class of Palestine through our continued struggle to achieve true liberation alongside them, as a part of our shared liberation along the identity that we have in common, as members of the working class. We do not fetishize the Palestinian population as victims who need special treatment, but rather we treat them as human beings with the same agency and the same herculean task as the rest of us. 

    Support for the oppressive rulers of an oppressed people so that they won’t fall under the rule of a different ruling class is a massive disservice to a population that has already suffered incredible hardship. When we express solidarity with Palestinians, is it based on ethnicity, nationality, and political orientation, or is it because even though they live thousands of miles away, we have more in common with them than we do with our national ruling class?

    To show solidarity with the working class of Palestine is important; in fact it is unavoidable for anyone with even a shred of empathy. But no matter the intention, the outcome of transforming this solidarity with Palestinians into critical support of its capitalist regime is a dangerous misstep that leads only to the continuation of the myths of nationalism and the legitimacy of the nation-state. In effect, this muddling of theory leads to confusion for the whole working class and its revolutionary movement, harming the possibility of freedom for the Palestinian people and all the workers of the world. 

    Until the time for global revolution is at hand we can only organize ourselves and the wider class so that all workers, including Palestinian workers, will be able to overthrow the oppressive system of capitalism that has caused such atrocities. When that time comes the Palestinian working class will play their own part in defeating the capitalist system in their own locale as well as the forces of counterrevolution that will inevitably attempt to respond to this radical act of liberation. Until then, it is nonsensical and directly harmful to give support to the very forces that play a role in the repression and control of the Palestinian working class. 

    Perhaps the hardest part of this struggle is to accept that as of now the class movement can only have a negligible effect on this ongoing Genocide, a massacre happening before the eyes of the whole globe. Yet the purpose of Communist organizing is not to do what makes us feel morally righteous, but to be radically honest with ourselves, to be brave enough to accept the truth of our abilities at this moment so that we may act in accordance with reality. We cannot stop this, neither through reformist demands nor rallying to the ideologies of National Socialists, opportunists, or outright reactionary nationalists.

    We cannot stop this slaughter, in the same way we cannot stop the slaughters in Sudan, in Myanmar, or Ukraine. Our duty as Internationalist communists who hold solidarity for all the world’s workers, to tirelessly organize and further our capacity for change in this horrific world, which can only mean building towards an international revolution to overthrow this world encompassing system. This means continuous defense of our hard learned positions and strategies, not only in the times where it is easy to do so, but especially in the times such as these where it is most difficult.

    We have a world to win, but we also have a world to lose. We can either learn from the mistakes of the past or repeat them. If you want to overthrow capitalism and build a world in which all people are free, only Communist organizations prepared to meet the revolutionary wave will be able to do so. If you want to support one imperialist bloc against another, join one of the various National Socialist organizations that warp the doctrine of Communism into the destruction of the working class.

    And Remember…

    Socialism or Barbarism, Communism or Extinction – There is no Third Way!


    Further Reading

    Capitalism’s Economic Foundations – The ICT

    The Invention of the White Race – Theodore W Allen

    1. https://www.ochaopt.org/content/reported-impact-snapshot-gaza-strip-22-october-2025 ↩︎
    2. https://liberationnews.org/psl-statement-trump-a-full-partner-in-israels-onslaught-against-iran-risks-wider-war/ ↩︎
    3. https://libcom.org/article/auschwitz-or-great-alibi ↩︎
    4. https://www.leftcom.org/en/articles/2015-08-06/1915-to-2015-a-century-of-genocide ↩︎
    5. https://www.marxists.org/history/etol/newspape/workersvanguard/1972/0012_00_10_1972.pdf ↩︎
    6. https://liberationnews.org/palestine-the-struggle-for-national-liberation-and-the-role-of-the-u-s-working-class/ ↩︎
    7. https://www.leftcom.org/en/articles/2002-11-01/against-israel-against-palestine-for-class-struggle ↩︎
  • Communist Critique of the Tempest Collective Statements of Purpose

    Struggle from Below

    The Tempest Collective sees the activity of the vast majority of the world’s population whose ability to work is their only means of survival as the crucial factor in building the socialist movement and The working class is the agent of social transformation – of ridding our society of capitalism, addressing the existential environmental catastrophe, and building a socialist society – if we can organize ourselves.

    Struggle is the key vehicle through which the balance of class forces can shift and on which will be won. However popular policy reforms are, historically these have not been won without a mass-based movement that involves millions of ordinary people.

    Mass struggle would also be the key to a revolutionary break with capitalism that starts a transition to ecosocialism. A transition to ecosocialism would have to be a liberatory process carried out by ordinary people themselves, running society through new radically democratic institutions.

    Antiracism & Abolition

    We are antiracists and abolitionists. The US working class has moved most forcefully and consistently when it has confronted racism, in particular anti-Black racism. We take this lesson seriously and If the socialist movement does not center the primacy of anti-oppression inside the working class, in all its diversity, it is not going to be effective. The George Floyd uprising was an important reminder of the power of Black-led resistance and how forcefully it can assert itself as a political actor, We see the anti-racist rebellion that took place in the summer of 2020 as the most important development of the current radicalization. Even with a movement still in development, its potential should not be underestimated.

    Crucial to the politics of abolition is the recognition that the state under capitalism is a means of violent repression wielded to ensure the domination of the ruling class. In the U.S., prisons and police are indispensable tools of racist oppression. As socialists, we fight for the full abolition of the cops, the courts, the prisons, and the capitalist state.

    Feminism & LGBTQ Liberation

    Internationally, the feminist and gender justice movement is the leading edge of working class resistance. Structural gender oppression under capitalism shapes life and resistance in myriad ways. It has shown itself to be a potent vehicle for social transformation.

    Standing against sexual violence, domestic violence, and femicide are questions of principle that socialists must develop ways of addressing – politically, but also organizationally, as very few groups can point to processes that have helped address grievances inside left organizations.

    We demand full equality and liberation for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer (LGBTQ) people and unequivocally oppose the attacks against transgender people, especially transgender women of color. The resurgence of trans-exclusionary feminism on the Left must be challenged. The project of revolutionary socialism aims to build a world based on sexual and gender freedom and self-determination.

    Disability Justice

    Capitalism both creates the category of disability and discriminates against the disabled on that basis. Capitalism privileges bodies that can labor in ways optimal to the production of profit for employers. The fight against oppression based on ability is thus inherently a struggle for working-class liberation and against the capitalist system.

    But because disability oppression is endemic to capitalism and implicated in the carceral state, overcoming it requires a revolutionary abolitionist program. Tempest stands with the disability justice movement and its calls for intersectional, anti-capitalist politics and full equality and liberation for disabled people. In practice, we are committed to making spaces for meeting, organizing, and protesting fully accessible.

    Electoral Strategy

    but they are not the motor-force of change. Elections can help develop and spread demands, and project a socialist worldview. However, we do not believe that winning elections is the same thing as winning power or changing the balance of class forces. The capitalist state is an anti-worker apparatus that cannot simply be taken over by workers.

    Independent Working Class Institutions

    We believe the Democratic Party cannot be reformed or realigned. Every previous effort to do so has weakened and undercut our ability to build the type of struggle organizations that could transcend the

    We are for an independent working class membership party and we are open to different tactics and roads to get us there. However, we insist that this strategy and process cannot be deferred down the line to a more favorable moment. we need to prepare for that now. Even people who support the Democrats over the Republicans in elections are more ready to criticize them and advocate a new party than ever before. Socialists should never be the people telling anyone who wants to break from the Democrats that they should stay inside. The socialist movement should be the home for those who yearn for

    The key ingredient in the formation of new working class organizations and parties is heightened working class self-activity and struggle that raises expectations and makes millions feel that change is possible. The growth of working class organization should go hand in hand with the growth of all wings of the movement, including a revolutionary one. This is the pole of the movement we aim to contribute to building, with the goal of a strong and vibrant revolutionary current, front or organization.

    Democracy

    Flowing from the centrality of struggle and working class self-activity is an insistence on democracy. Democracy is relevant in multiple ways – from ensuring that our organizations are run by the membership, We believe that the weakness of the organized left goes hand in hand with a lack of organizations through which working class people can participate in political, workplace and community decisions. Whether it is a tenant group, a labor union, a BLM organization, etc, democracy and participation is a crucial factor to the development of working class institutions. The lifeblood of socialist organization, in particular, is a thriving democratic culture.

    Labor Strategy

    We see working class self-activity and democracy – We look to workers in their workplaces to organize themselves for their own interests, a rank-and-file labor strategy, which is a political and organizational orientation on the self-activity of workers inside the workers movement. We believe this will facilitate the creation of our goals more than a strategy of building influence through the labor bureaucracy or staffers in the existing unions. For us, the rank-and-file strategy is about much more than simply having socialists inside strategic sectors or getting union jobs. Through the development of a socialist wing of the workers movement, a strategy for class power can become a reality by overcoming the strategic impediments that have hamstrung the organized labor movement for decades.

    Internationalism, Anti-Imperialism & Self Determination

    We are internationalists. We support working class self activity in every country and oppose the borders that physically, violently, and ideologically divide workers from one another. We are always on the side of ordinary people in their quest for

    We are principally opposed to imperialism, which we understand to be the manifestation of capitalist relations at the level of the nation-state. Imperialism is not an abstract concept, it is the inevitable outgrowth of a system built on profit and competition between capitalist states. As the economic crisis intensifies, so too will ramped up rivalries between different countries. Military activity is part of the package of attacks on working class people internationally.

    We vehemently oppose US imperialism, which has destroyed the lives of our brothers and sisters across the world and has served as the justification for amped up islamophobia and xenophobia. We also hold a principled opposition to all imperial interests that are competing for international power. Instead of choosing sides with one imperial bloc over the other, we look to the strengthening of working class solidarity internationally as the central opposition to capitalism.

    As socialists in the world’s biggest imperial power — in a country founded on settler-colonialism — we see our support for the struggles of indigenous, colonized and occupied people as a cornerstone of anti-imperialism. From Turtle Island to Palestine and beyond,


    Link to Original

  • Communist Critique of the DSA Marxist Unity Group Points of Unity

    1. Political Independence

    We want DSA to free itself from and all other capitalist influences.

    Marxist Unity Group strives to Independence means establishing a distinct public profile for DSA with our own platform, branding, and rhetoric. It also means building our own institutions and our own party discipline We would stand with unwavering confidence in our cause, never watering down our socialist vision or subordinating our interests to those of

    Together, we would by running militant socialist candidates for public office—while simultaneously organizing grassroots institutions of working class power. We would create party-affiliated media, community services, mutual aid and defensive organizations. Within the labor movement, we would fight the existing labor bureaucracy, and strive to win these unions to socialist politics. As we nurture a vast ecosystem of socialist-allied institutions, our socialist party will simultaneously become a mass movement: a party-movement. Together, we would cultivate a popular mandate for revolution by running militant socialist candidates for public office—while simultaneously organizing grassroots institutions of working class power. We would create party-affiliated media, community services, mutual aid and defensive organizations. Within the labor movement, we would fight the existing labor bureaucracy, build militant and democratic unions, and strive to win these unions to socialist politics. As we nurture a vast ecosystem of socialist-allied institutions, our socialist party will simultaneously become a mass movement: a party-movement.

    Marxist Unity Group calls for immediate steps towards political independence. We become a party by acting like one. For us, the ‘break’ with is a continuous process that must begin in earnest right now. This will require courage and faith in our ability to succeed as an independent movement, but we believe that the socialist movement is worthy of that faith. We support a transition towards independent campaigns —even if this causes a Building a distinct socialist constituency is the paramount task of our political era, and independent campaigns help us cultivate loyalty that is completely disconnected from loyalty to the Democratic Party.

    2. Programmatic Unity

    We want a program to guide DSA’s political work.

    To achieve political independence, We want a disciplined, self-reliant organization that is run democratically by its rank and file members. This approach is called programmatic unity: unity based on common struggle or vague slogans that obscure our true objectives. Acceptance of a political program with specific demands on the state is how the first mass socialist parties A program provides direction on the political demands that will establish socialism and democratic rule by the working class without prescribing a narrow tactical route.

    Marxist Unity Group works towards adopting a minimum-maximum program for DSA. We view both the ‘minimum’ and ‘maximum’ program as essential. The minimum program refers to the party’s comprehensive platform: the policies that it will immediately implement upon taking power to establish working-class political rule and place society on the path of a socialist transition out of capitalism. The maximum program refers to the results of this process: a world free of the market, borders, classes, and all other oppressive structures that exist under capitalism—in a word, communism. Centering programmatic politics will restore the sense of unity and purpose that However, our program will have much more ambitious aims, and

    We would like to make ‘program acceptance’ the basis of DSA membership. Acceptance does not mean agreeing with everything in the program. It simply means being willing to fight for the program as an expression of the movement’s democratically-elaborated aims. Members would have the right to organize for specific changes to the program at conventions. Members will be free to publicly voice disagreement with any majority decision, as long as they can accept the decision as legitimate and assist with its implementation. This is the true meaning of democratic centralism.

    3. Electoral Discipline

    Discipline and cohesion are another foundation of our political independence. If DSA candidates are truly dedicated to socialist politics, they should run together on a common DSA platform. Even if some are elected on a Democratic ballot line, they should form their own legislative caucuses, vote as a bloc, and refuse to join the Democratic Party caucus. They should also campaign for other socialists, refuse to endorse non-socialists, and only take the wage of a typical union worker. With these assertive political tactics, our candidates will rise as ‘tribunes of the people’: organized representatives of the socialist movement. DSA members have already implemented some elements of this approach in the New York state legislature, but we would like to formalize and universalize it. Horse-trading and spineless compromise have failed to truly advance socialist politics. but we want socialists to conduct that struggle out in the open and win concessions by acting as an intransigent opposition. Instead of cutting backroom deals as a junior coalition partner, socialist electeds can use their platform to raise the expectations of the working class and mobilize it to force concessions from the capitalists.

    4. Nationwide Struggle

    We want socialists to treat U.S. politics as a struggle for power

    As socialists in the United States, we live in a reactionary political culture that encourages us to think small. Americans are taught to believe that all problems should be solved locally, and socialists often accept this logic by confining themselves to isolated local campaigns, assuming that this is where ‘real change happens.’ Yet despite our backwards federal system, the United States is not an alliance of city-states or a network of 20,000 police departments. It is a colossal empire propped up by the most powerful military on Earth. Even local police are armed, trained, and integrated by the federal government. If we ignore national politics, we will become blind to the true nature of our oppressors. We will obscure their nationwide abuse of the working class, not to mention their imperialist crimes in every corner of the world. Local organizing is an indispensable foundation of our movement, but it will be infinitely more effective when it is connected to a nationwide, pan-American, and global vision for working class revolution.

    Marxist Unity Group will work to increase DSA acting as a nationwide organization. We will build nationwide collaboration and debate through DSA’s national committees and also through developing a lively party press. We support efforts to lift chapters out of parochialism by increasing member communication across chapter lines, maintaining staffing levels required to make member-led organizing possible at the national level while ensuring fair pay and working conditions, and by integrating locals into larger state-level organizations. It is also why we want DSA to run an organized slate of socialist candidates to contest the House of Representatives. By conducting principled agitation in the halls of Congress, socialists can deliver a common message to every corner of the country. While we use the federal government as a bully pulpit, our candidates could also use their public profiles to support state and municipal organizing efforts. Federal, state, and local struggles—strikes, electoral campaigns, and mass demonstrations—will all be fused together in one grand movement that demands nothing less than a working-class, socialist revolution.

    5. Fight the Imperial Police State

    We want socialists to challenge the repressive structures of the capitalist state.

    U.S. socialists have a duty to stand firmly against militarism and police tyranny, beginning with a clear opposition to the imperialist designs of our own state. In the belly of the American empire, any socialist program must firmly oppose (neo)colonialism and advance the principles of —that each country must be sovereign to decide its own affairs, free from military coercion or economic extortion. This means taking a defeatist stance against wars, including those engaged by proxies and through military alliances like NATO, as well as cruel economic sanctions and military and diplomatic cover for colonial occupation, police repression, and ethnic cleansing.

    But a defeatist stance against U.S. imperialism must exist alongside a revolutionary commitment to politically-independent international action. A lasting transition to socialism in any one country is impossible, and the working class can only emancipate itself on an international scale. The decline of much of the socialist movement in the 20th century into variant forms of nationalism and popular frontism —from the official communist ‘national roads to socialism’ to the earlier capitulation of social democracy to ‘defense of the nation’ during WWI—have equally led to strategic dead-ends and tragic defeat. Though the working class of any country must first of all ‘come to terms with its own bourgeoisie,’ domestic reforms are only partial victories for an international class.

    The socialist movement takes a leading role in expressing this international character in several ways, such as coordinated international strike action — like the historic May Day strikes —fiercely combating anti-immigrant chauvinism, and As its far-reaching political objective, our party should commit to building fraternal ties with class-independent socialist parties towards the horizon of a new International.

    With every tool available to us, we must erode the political, cultural, and physical hegemony of the U.S. police state. The affirmative votes of DSA-endorsed electeds for military and cop budgets, arms shipments to US vassal states, and the legal condemnation of anti-Zionism, all serve to weaken the socialist project for human emancipation. It is insufficient for socialist legislators to rhetorically criticize excessive military spending. They should be bound by our program to force a genuine public confrontation over the matter by refusing to vote for military, police, national security and intelligence budgets. By building a genuine and disciplined party infrastructure, DSA legislators and councilors would be on the forefront of a nation-wide confrontation with the imperialist state, exposing the interconnectedness of police and military brutality.

    As we wage immediate struggles against repressive capitalist institutions like police departments and ICE, a socialist vision for abolitionism requires concrete, programmatic commitment to alternative, radically democratic political institutions, recognizing that The racist militarized border regime will be with complete freedom of movement for all peoples and universal citizenship for residents. The armed forces of international capital—the prison industrial complex, police, and the military—will be replaced by a democratic and popular militia, flowing from the working class and the oppressed’s organs of self-defense established under capitalism—defined by the right to bear arms, the sovereignty of the people, universal service and training, and a rigorous community control coexisting with the democratic rights of members.

    6. Fight the Contitution

    We want socialists to fight to

    Marxist Unity opposes a constitution that was written by a ‘holy alliance’ of capitalists and slavers to make the United States a perpetual There can be no question of submitting to a political order that exists to divide and conquer the working class, that slices up the government and divorces it from the will of the people—that is set in stone and almost impossible to amend. Black people cannot be free under indigenous people cannot win sovereignty under a constitution designed to facilitate their elimination; women cannot be free under and working people cannot be free under No one can be truly free if they are forced to bow to a reactionary constitution written by the dead. We want socialist leaders to erode the popular legitimacy of the U.S. Constitution through combative political agitation: never bowing to the old order, and always acknowledging the need for a working class revolution in the United States.

    The socialist revolution will not base its legitimacy on the laws of We will base it on a democratic majority mandate for socialism. This majority may be expressed by the popular vote of an election, but it does not have to take that form if the state represses our ability to contest elections. We stand for the right of the working class to take power by any means necessary. To win a socialist republic, millions of working people must be mobilized in their workplaces, and in the street. We recognize that the capitalist class relies on the minoritarian rule of the U.S. Constitution, and they will not give it up peacefully. The working class will need armed self-defense to protect itself from the inevitable violence of reaction. To complete a successful revolution, we must win a decisive section of the military rank and file over to our side.

    7. Demand a New Republic, Finish Reconstruction

    We want to win

    We fight the Constitution to win a democratic socialist republic in North America, to complete the partial overthrow of the constitutional order by the Civil War and the abolition of slavery, and to finish the project of Reconstruction by establishing a multiracial and multinational democracy ruled by the toilers of society. Forged in revolution, this continental republic will strive for the global liberation of all working and oppressed people. We desire the widest possible geographic scope for such a state so that it can most effectively carry out this mission, All indigenous and colonized peoples must win sovereignty, including those living within the current borders of the United States.

    Alongside ecological and economic crises, the minoritarian and sclerotic constitutional order will contribute to massive political crises in the coming decades. This period of crisis will provide our class with an opportunity to topple the old order and convene a revolutionary Popular Assembly: Under the democratic leadership of a victorious socialist party, the Popular Assembly will proceed to construct the socialist order. It will dismantle the slaveholder constitution and write the founding documents of the new republic.

    Immediately upon taking power, socialists will implement a sweeping minimum program to cement working class political rule. We will need to destroy every institution that denies the people an authentic popular democracy, abolishing the Senate, the Electoral College, the Supreme Court, and the independent presidency. We will implement direct, universal, and equal suffrage. Delegates will be recallable at any time and All parties that accept the laws of the new revolutionary order will be free to operate. Local organs of government will have a wide degree of autonomy. Unrestricted freedom of speech will be guaranteed to all. To make good on the unfulfilled promise of Reconstruction, our republic will launch social programs of targeted wealth redistribution, striving to eliminate all racial inequalities. The socialist republic will put political power and economic resources into the hands of all racially oppressed and colonized people.

    Our broader economic program will include unimpeded labor and union rights, a massive reduction in working hours, and a truly universal welfare state that provides for all citizens from cradle to grave. We will create programs to reduce the power of bureaucrats and teach administrative skills to all workers. Worker self-management will be encouraged to the greatest extent achievable in every industry. Large industry will be placed under collective ownership early on, and we will progressively socialize the rest of the economy as we build our capacity for democratic economic planning. We will pursue crash course programs to address the ecological crisis and establish resilient forms of production, distribution and habitation. Climate refugees will be welcomed into our republic with open arms.

    With the shackles of the old order broken, the working class will finally have the power to remake society on egalitarian lines. In cooperation with the global socialist movement, we will move closer with every passing year to a fully liberated classless society: communism. Communism abolishes money, class distinctions, racial discrimination, patriarchy, national boundaries, oppressive gender roles, the mental/manual division of labor, and all other forms of social oppression. It is a society truly based on the principle “from each according to their ability, to each according to their need,” where humanity collectively plans its economic activities through a free association of labor. Communism brings freedom to both society and the individual and will be the true beginning of human history.


    Link to Original

  • Communist Critique of The DSA Emerge Points of Unity

    For a Communism for the 21st century

    Our emergent strategy draws from while

    Our framework: The need for working class revolution in our lifetime is urgent. Our world’s resources should be used for the wellbeing of all people — but instead, enrich themselves at the expense of our lives and the planet. As the working class is exploited by the capitalist class, so too is the Global South by the Global North. Imperialism and colonialism continue to appropriate the bodies and ecologies of the peoples of the world to develop the

    Our moment: At home and abroad, liberation movements resist the poverty and war imposes upon them. The world system ruled by 20th century capitalism is ending. If we are going to take a meaningful role in that transformation, we must engage in a parallel struggle, stitching together diverse social forces to organize a mass front against global imperialism and domestic carceral fascism. To construct a world-changing solidarity, we organize locally, identifying where class confrontation is already happening — in the street, , against prisons and detention centers, and in our neighborhoods. Our organizing aims to erode relationships of domination and build collective power, so that we may chart our shared destiny in unity.

    Our inspiration: To ground our principles and inform our tactics, we look to Marxist theory and liberatory projects around the world. We study how communist parties operated in the Russian , , and how anti-colonial movements fought for We look to historical struggles in the U.S., like , the rise of the , and the , and reflect on the gains and challenges faced by recent projects like the Palestinian resistance movement, the Latin American Pink Tide, and the George Floyd uprising.

    Our implementation: We are partisans of this global tradition, analyzing, criticizing, and continuing the work of generations before. But we also intend to transform along with our conditions. Thus, we emphasize deliberation, democracy and diversity as keys to our adaptive method. We are proudly a multi-tendency communist caucus. We view our diversity of ideologies, roots and lived experiences as a tool in the synthesis of developing new strategies for our present circumstances.

    For the Abolition of Domination and Exclusion

    Liberation requires prison abolition – which we fight for in solidarity with the oppressed on their own terms, against expansion of the carceral state and in pursuit of transformative justice.

    Our present society rests on division of the working class through identity-based oppression, upheld by the carceral state. Incarceration, criminalization,and police violence are tactics forged from slavery to visibly keep the marginalized in line, disproportionately targeting Black and brown people.

    Our practice of abolition centers solidarity. We show up in the streets to combat the criminalization of Black life, houselessness, and poverty. We rally for bodily autonomy for women and all trans and gender non-conforming people. We mobilize against police brutality; we train ourselves and others in harm reduction for drug users. We defend our neighbors against ICE and agitate to demilitarize our borders. We call for ; for . By committing to abolition, and conceals its true function: as a machine of domination and violence, in service of nothing other than capital.

    For Revolutionary Anti-Imperialism

    Unequal exchange binds workers of the world together in an exploitative hierarchy, which we must help topple from within

    Our place in society is largely determined by where we are born. For the same labor, workers in the Global South are paid a fraction of what workers are paid in the Global North, all to fuel development in Western nations at the expense of their own livelihoods and security. , use their militaries and global financial institutions to maintain this unequal worldsystem and violently smother socialist states and liberation struggles all over the world. As socialists in the imperial core, we must oppose all interventions that uphold — military, economic, or otherwise — and fight for a world economy which is planned to allow all humanity to flourish.

    Accordingly, Emerge seeks to incorporate anti-imperialism in DSA’s labor activism and . Rather than enabling the unequal dynamics of world trade to benefit U.S. workers alone, we must grow the militancy and solidarity of our labor movement so it opposes and colonialism everywhere. Likewise, we must advocate not just for “green growth” for the West, but for ecosocialist policy built on principles of just global transition and respect for all life. Beyond working to improve the lives of Americans, To combat capitalism we must confront imperialism.

    For Democratic Working Class Organization and Movements

    Given our strategic position between movements, labor, and DSA should be a connective tissue of the and a strong collaborator and leader. This means forging broad coalitions and Emerge members work in their local communities within organizations like , tenant unions, and community safety networks, building avenues for working class autonomy and class struggle independent of the nonprofit industrial complex. Emerge also builds with street movements to practice security culture and self defense, both to stand our communal ground and to prepare for direct action in crisis. We believe is fundamental to building bonds in ongoing collective struggle and keeping attuned to possibilities for revolutionary breaks.

    However, in Emerge, we do not equate a seat at the table with actual power in an inherently hostile state. To actually transform society, we need independent movements , through applying external pressure and bolstering defense from reactionary forces.

    For Collective Care, Equity, and Democratic Culture

    To sustain our movement through lifelong struggle, we prioritize equity, practice accountability, and enshrine democracy in our internal culture.

    The struggle to abolish all forms of oppression begins with our own organizational practices. Aware of our upbringing in patriarchal, chauvinist mores, we strive to maintain gender and racial parity in our caucus membership, to evenly spread reproductive labor, and to guarantee shared ownership of our decisions through transparent processes. we check the tide of majority rule and actively foster consensus, which sets the foundation for taking nimble action “at the speed of trust” when circumstances require it.

    As disability is a feature, not a failing, of the human experience, we work to dismantle ableist attitudes and infrastructure. We prioritize making our caucus more equitable, and develop practices to ensure our spaces are safe, accessible, and nurturing.

    We consider debate an important tool to develop our collective thought, and value disagreement as a sign of good faith engagement. We work to meet each other where we’re at with patience and a learning mindset, acknowledging harm when it occurs and seeking opportunities for growth. In doing so, we deepen our politics, our practice as organizers, and our bonds as comrades that will sustain us in the long fight we face together.


    Link To Original

  • Did I Achieve Anything By Going to This Protest?

    The following is a pamphlet we handed out at the No Kings protest in Tucson

  • People’s Urban History Of Tucson – 1977

    The following is a comic produced by the Tucson Community Development/Design Center in 1977. It’s views do not exactly match our own however we feel it is a piece of history worth sharing and archiving. As far as we are aware, this version has a few pages missing, however, it is the most complete version we could find.

  • Why Bother? Capitalism Will Obviously Last Forever!

    Why Bother? Capitalism Will Obviously Last Forever!


    Intro, What is Revolution?

    The most common response we have received to our critique of reformism as a viable strategy for the achievement of communism (other than an attempted refutation of Communism itself) is the defeatist belief that capitalism will, for better or worse, sustain itself indefinitely. That a mix of reform and suppression will eternally stabilize the system and prevent the proletariat from organizing themselves and revolting, or at least that it will do so for long enough that some existential threat brought upon the earth by capitalism kills everyone (namely climate change). Therefore, that in such an eternal system perhaps it is better to try and improve the system than to meaninglessly prepare for a future one that will never come.

    This is an understandable belief, but it is also a false one. Every attempt at socialist revolution has to this point failed, yet we must remember that for centuries the right of kings held complete dominion over humanity, and even the idea of liberal capitalism was utopian, certainly more utopian than communism is by today’s standards. To believe capitalism is some unchanging form of society that will never be overcome is a misunderstanding of the nature of human society and its historical transformation. 

    What was it that usurped feudalism and replaced it with capitalism? What usurped the system that came before feudalism, and the system that came before that? Revolution. All of the sudden periods of massive societal change that have led to an entirely new era of human history have been what we call revolutions. It is because we seek to establish a new era of human history that we must inherently advocate for a revolution, the process of bringing about a new form of society. Every revolution has taken a completely different form as the conditions existing at the time that the revolution occurred were vastly different, and the fundamental transformation of the everyday existence of all humanity in its current form (from a class society with private ownership into a classless society with common ownership) can only be called a Communist revolution. From that point, we can only discuss what form the future Communist revolution will take. 

    In European late feudalism a wealthy middle class began to appear as overseas traders and bankers organized together into guilds. As a class they wielded considerable wealth, but because of their low birth they were not awarded the social privileges of the aristocracy (the class of lords and kings). In time and through a number of measures, this new class, which we now call the bourgeois, was able to transform its economic power into political power. This was the necessary revolution in which capitalism overthrew feudalism and the bourgeoisie overthrew the aristocracy as the ruling class.

    In modern capitalism there is a small number of this new ruling class in each nation, and there is the rest of the population, which is the working class. The lines of power are drawn at the difference between those with massive amounts of property and those without. All that the working class has is their modest personal property, their instruments of labor (their own bodies and minds), and the chains that keep them in this coercive arrangement. 

    This means that in the transition from Capitalism into Communism, the revolutionary class must be the international working class (the proletariat). The working class is not able to carve out a section of the economy for itself as the bourgeois did under feudalism. Instead of gaining economic power and leveraging it into political power, this revolution requires the working class to first gain political power and then leverage it into economic power. 

    This political power cannot be won in the systems established by the ruling class. It must be won independently because all forms of current bourgeois politics are just that, bourgeois. The purpose of modern government is to organize the domination of the ruling class over the working class. The first objective the modern revolutionary movement must achieve is the overthrow and destruction of the bourgeois/capitalist system. To even passively accept the legitimacy of bourgeois rule (such as by advocating reforms like public power or asking the capitalist state to stop Project Blue) represents a failure in this critical first step. 

    The overthrow of bourgeois governments and systems across the world will of course be difficult and painful; accordingly, this is the part of the process that people most doubt will be possible. But as we will outline, the conditions that ensure it is possible will come about naturally. 

    Once the proletariat has fully established and secured its independent, democratic, and international power through mass assemblies and workers councils, only then can the process of the revolutionary transformation of society really occur.  

    This transition into an entirely new egalitarian world without exploitation is the core of the revolutionary process that we advocate for. In the rest of this article, we hope to articulate how and why the international proletariat can in fact, take all political power for itself and we will expand upon the exact turn of events that can bring about the victory of the world Communist revolution.

    Capitalism Trends Towards Crisis – The Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall

    At the very center of this whole discussion is the undeniable fact that due to its own nature, capitalism trends towards periods of crisis, like in the great depression, the 2008 crash, etc. This trend is the process that ensures capitalism’s downfall is possible. Even the bourgeois politicians of the democratic and republican parties have to pay lip service to this decline in living standards with their talk of lowering prices; though they obviously can’t disclose its ultimate cause or actually solve these issues. This is because their real cause is the system itself. 

    The crisis of capitalism is first and foremost a crisis of abundance. Not one of overpopulation and lack of resources as it is so often portrayed by the interests of capital and the various reactionary fools that support them.

    Imagine you are the owner of a business making cloth. Cloth is produced in large part by handlooms, which are able to produce a certain square footage of fabric each hour. With an investment into a power loom, you are then able to hire a worker to produce three times as much square footage of fabric in the same amount of time. This increase in productivity then allows you to undersell your competitors, and despite selling at a cheaper price; the more efficient production that uses less labor time means that your profit (revenue-cost) is higher. 

    Great, but now both you and your competitors will begin to expand their investment and must use these power looms by necessity (as the old method is far less efficient and has been made obsolete). As the majority of your profit comes not from the production of the cloth itself; but from the advantage your company had with this new production over the wider market, you eventually find yourself in a situation where you can no longer extract the same profits once the wider market adapts to meet the efficiency of your company. In response, you need another new technology to outcompete the others again. This cycle continues on and on.

    What has been left out is what necessarily happens to the workers during this process. The tendency of the rate of profit to fall is always felt the hardest by the most vulnerable class in society, the working class. When the capitalist buys the new machinery, they often must lay off a number of their workers who have been made redundant. What happens to these people who have just lost their livelihood is absolutely irrelevant to the interests of the owner. At the same time, the less the capitalist has to pay their workers the better off the owner is. With the owner in a situation of constant and intense market competition, any compassion or support for a worker makes their company less competitive. If their company gave a generous severance package to their laid-off workers, that is a substantial amount of money that could have gone towards the purchase of new machines instead. It opens up the opportunity for their competitor to not be as kind and make the choice to not pay those they fire, or pay them very little. By any standards of morality and human respect, this is the worse option. By the logic of the capitalist market, this is the efficient option that is often rewarded by further success in economic competition. 


    These choices extend to hiring, training, wages, workers’ safety, etc. The more money put into labor, the less the capitalist can put into capital (machines and other investments), which are what allows them to outcompete other businesses. What this ultimately means is that capitalists making entirely necessary choices to remain individually competitive and profitable in the market eventually leads to an economy where nothing is profitable, even with extremely repressive and exploitative treatment of workers. As competition constantly intensifies, a race to the top means the methods to extract more and more profit run into the inherent limitations of both technology and the exploitation of workers, as there is only a certain rate at which technology can advance and only so much the workers can be exploited beyond the point at which they can no longer function. 

    While it is a very simplified explanation, this is essentially what is described by the “tendency of the rate of profit to fall”. The process where competition drives efficiency, but efficiency is associated with higher costs. At a certain point, a system that requires endless growth and perfect efficiency runs into the limitations of the real world.

    Reform Cannot Prevent Crisis or Sustain Capitalism Forever

    While this reality is often acknowledged as inherently unavoidable in a pure and stupid form of capitalism; there is a tendency we have noticed within the reformist left that claims such a process can be prevented from occurring by a more insidious and smart capitalism. One which employs welfare to appease the working masses and takes on large debts to be the new source of demand in a saturated capitalism. From this belief (which ultimately says that capitalism will sustain itself for eternity) stems the conclusion that we must therefore dedicate ourselves not to overthrowing the system, but instead making sure we have the right people in control of it so that it may take on a better form.

    This belief itself stems from a fundamental misunderstanding of the reasons capitalism enters crisis and the mechanisms by which economic policy can address it. As explained in the section on the tendency of the rate of profit to fall, profit comes from outcompeting competition. The crisis of capitalism is predominantly caused by a saturation of capital in the market that leads to a loss of profitability as there is eventually no inefficient production to outcompete. It is not just a lack of demand that can be fixed by government stimulus. 

    This is not to say that such policies are incapable of delaying such a crisis. Historical precedent as well as general logic prove as much to be true. What is misunderstood however is the changes these policies represent in the real economy (the everyday lives of workers and the operations of capital) and the reasons they cannot satiate the needs of capital forever.

    Firstly, such deficit policies (taken when capitalism enters crisis) do serve the needs of capital insofar as they raise general prices through inflation. While this raising of prices does raise the costs of production for business (through material costs), it also raises the price of whatever they produce to a similar amount. Any slight loss that results from this process is then recuperated by the lowering of real wages to the workers that results from inflation (If you get paid the same but everything costs more your real wages are less). This temporarily increases the rate of profit, but also necessarily presents an issue to the system of capital in that the workers will eventually reach a breaking point where they revolt against their gradual impoverishment.

    This then necessitates social programs, which bolster the lives of the workers without needing a direct increase in pay from the capitalists. Yet in the same way as government investment into businesses impoverishes the workers, investment into workers will in turn impoverish the businesses. Workers having more money does mean more demand for consumer goods, but capital is primarily driven not by consumer goods but by its own reproduction.

    Government policy is, much to the dismay of bourgeois economists, more of a lever than an actual driving force. It can create wealth only when there is room for growth within the capitalist system, beyond which point reformist policy can only move wealth from one section of the economy to another.

    Yet to say that capitalism cannot sustain itself forever is not to say that it will overthrow itself. For revolution to occur, there is a second prerequisite beyond just crisis.

    From Crisis to Communism

    The role of the revolutionary minority of workers and the party that it forms is to be the historical memory and advisor of the whole working class. Class conscious workers who understand a revolutionary transformation of society is necessary to end their exploitation (Communists) must study class struggle across time and space and use the lessons learned from these events to build a unified political program. 

    Most people will not be ready for revolution until their only choices are to fight back or die. Although there is always a section of the working class that is willing to revolt at any given time, the proportion of the population who becomes willing and able to do so grows in relation to the degradation of their own material conditions. Mass working class militancy is a necessary prerequisite for revolution and it occurs only in times of serious crisis as the contradictions of the capitalist system become too obvious to ignore for the segments of the population who were placated and given some privileges when the system could still afford to do so.

    It is in the period of crisis that the majority of the working class will be able and willing to rise to the occasion of overthrowing capitalism. Organized communist militants are not the driving force behind this trend as it is the system itself that pushes more and more workers to this point of desperation. Where communists do influence this process is in shaping how this dissatisfaction and anger ultimately manifest.

    For a large scale working class uprising to become a successful Communist revolution a large enough proportion of the entire global working class must be actively working towards achieving Communism. The role of the Communist party is being a space for this revolutionary minority of the class to gather, organize, spread this understanding, and develop the revolutionary program for the whole working class to implement. History shows that a dedicated Communist organization with the correct theoretical understanding can rapidly multiply its membership to the point it can have a real effect on the revolution during the crisis, but for this to occur we must work to build our organizations as much as possible before this next period of crisis fully sets in.

    Conclusion

    Everywhere where workers and capitalists exist side by side, class consciousness, and therefore revolution, is possible. Rather than the intense suppression of the working class and its revolutionary minority being what makes revolution unlikely, it is a sign of just how desperate the ruling class is to fight this possibility. The more the fire of revolution spreads, the more the capitalists have to try to stamp it out. After all, if they had nothing to fear and revolution was truly impossible, they would not have to dedicate entire industries and organizations to its continued suppression. 

    Our current role as revolutionary Communists is to help the working class gain class consciousness and to use this understanding to reach its ultimate revolutionary conclusion. If the Communist programme is sufficiently understood and accepted by militant workers, then that movement of class conscious members of the working class can expand rapidly and will lead to the transformation of our society. 

    For decades now, workers have been reduced to passive observers as their lives are made worse, and projections of what the future will look like seem more bleak than ever. The question is whether or not this will be tolerated, whether workers across nations will realize the real power they hold, whether we can unite as one and build a new and better world.

    To those who even now say the fight is already lost, then why not try? To those workers who oppose us, why would you comply with your master’s subliminal orders? And to those who read our words and know somewhere deep in your gut that there is truth to them, what are you waiting for? If what you fear is being singled out by the forces of reaction, why wait for them to embolden themselves before you organize? Whether you join the revolution or not, its failure will mean your death.

    The success of the World Communist Revolution is the only path away from enslavement, despair, and death. It is the duty of those who recognize the possibility of true human emancipation to join in this monumental struggle from the moment they acknowledge that it exists. For it is also your struggle, its defeat or victory will be your own.

    And remember

    Socialism or Barbarism, Communism or ExtinctionThere is no third way!


    further reading

    The Tendency of the Rate of Profit to Fall

    Capitalism’s Economic Foundations (Part I)

    The Failures of Reformist Economics

    Marx and Keynes: The Limits of the Mixed Economy, Paul Mattick